Jeff Schweitzer, blogging at the Huffington Post, has one of the best analyses of the election that I've seen. In his post, "The Price of Failure and Rise of Extremism: How Democrats Blew It", he writes: "the depth, intensity, and institutionalized hypocrisy of the political right has taken our country on a new course; conservatives are writing a new chapter...on cynicism, deceit and delusion. As we contemplate our world dominated by Republicans controlling the House and Senate, we must therefore consider life in the face of deep hypocrisy. Mitch McConnell, with a straight face and no apparent appreciation for irony, said that voters should install a Republican majority in the Senate because his party would 'be able to bring the current legislative gridlock to a merciful end.'...This story highlights the major failure of the left. Democrats have not defined the agenda or narrated the story. This capitulation creates a void of reason such that absurdities like McConnell's claim can take hold without everybody doubling over in laughter. Like frightened children Democrats run from Obama's record, as defined by the right, rather than championing his amazing successes as defined by fact."
One thing is certain. Before the members of the 114th Congress take their seats in January, Senate Democrats need to push through as many of the 156 pending Federal judicial and executive branch nominations as they can. Failure to do so will ensure Republican control of the judiciary and make Obama's last two years even more difficult and unproductive than the past four have been. Hey Mitch, this may be a good place to start showing how intent you are to end gridlock.
What do we have to look forward to from this extremist Congress and a ham-strung moderate President in the next two years?
Some things are clear.
There will be cuts to domestic programs, increases in military spending, tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations, and, if Obama and Congressional Democrats don't go along with their radical agenda, a government shutdown or two. Any progress on the environmental front will need to come from executive action. The War Powers Act as applied to the Middle East will not be changed and there will be no debate on the current bombing campaign. Obama will not be able to get any progressive or even moderate appointments to the Federal judiciary through Congress. One "good news" item: Social Security will not be privatized anytime soon.
Some things are not as clear.
Will Obama have the votes to resist neo-con-inspired congressional actions, such as increasing sanctions on Iran and funding for sectarian wars? Will he have the courage to pursue justice for the Palestinians and the courage to achieve a just Palestinian-Israeli peace? Will he be able to close Guantanamo, that continuing insult to America's self-proclaimed adherence to the rule of law?
What changes will be made to the Affordable Care Act? Democrats should retain at least 45 Senate seats and Obama still has the veto. So total repeal will be impossible. However, Congressional Republicans can certainly reduce the number of people covered by the ACA - by removing the employer requirements and redefining full-time employees, by removing the penalty for non-coverage, and by reducing or ending subsidies for those earning too much to qualify under the Medicaid expansion.
Will Obama take executive action to progress immigration reform? Will the Republicans threaten impeachment if he does so? Will any action at all be proposed by Congress other than increased militarization of the US-Mexico border? Republicans did not need the Latino vote to win these midterms and Obama's deportation policies were not something that would energize Latino voters.
How extensive will changes to Medicare be? Along with Social Security and the Affordable Care Act, it remains one of the prime examples of what a Democratic Congress and President can accomplish. That makes it a target for the extremists who now control the Republican Party - no matter how successful and well-liked it is.
Perhaps the best comment I heard during my GOTV calls in the weeks before the election was from a Kentucky voter. He could not understand how anyone but "the 1%" could ever vote Republican, how people could continually vote against their own economic interests. He mentioned that Kentuckians were hearing almost nothing about McConnell's opponent, Alison Lundergan Grimes, and a lot about Obama. That strategy played very well in the South. Later in my calls that evening, I spoke to another Kentuckian - an older woman, who was going to vote for McConnell because she was "tired of the handouts." I thought of asking her which handouts in particular she opposed but realizing how thoroughly Republican myths have taken hold, I refrained.
This is the richest nation the world has ever seen. We have one of the lowest tax rates, one of the highest levels of income inequality, and one of the least generous social safety net programs in the developed world. To say we cannot afford to meet the basic needs of the most vulnerable in our society or to provide medical care for all is a lie. But it is a lie that has become deeply ingrained in the political dialogue of the nation over the past three decades - a lie that has no place for "the common good" and promises more and more to those that have the most.
Featured Posts
Democracy: The What's Left of It Edition
(July, 2013)
(July, 2013)
Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons
No comments:
Post a Comment