Here on the East Coast of the US, 2013
is the year of the return of the seventeen-year cicadas. I have not
as yet actually heard any cicadas this year but, all in good time,
I'm sure. The seventeen-year cicadas have an unusual life cycle to
say the least. Nearly all cicadas spend years underground as
juveniles, before emerging above ground for a short adult stage of
several weeks to a few months. Periodical cicada species, such as the
17 year cicadas, are so named because, in any one location, all of
the members of the population are developmentally synchronized—they
emerge as adults all at once in the same year. This periodicity is
especially remarkable because their life cycles are so long.
[Wikipedia; photo: Wikipedia]
Prompted by what appeared to be a
cicada that had been crushed underfoot by an (I hope) unawares jogger
in a nearby park, I began thinking about those 17-year cicadas the
other day. The seventeen years between their emergences are about
half of a human generation. Seventeen years also seems to be about
the length of time at which details of events, the ambience of the
political climate, and all but the deeper personal memories begin, in
many instances, to blur or be forgotten. So how was the country
doing in 1996? Well, the nation was getting ready for the
Presidential elections with Clinton, Dole and Perot the eventual
candidates. With the GDP up almost 4.5% vs. 1995 and with
unemployment at 4.7%, we were in the midst of an economic boom.
Nevertheless, a budget showdown between Clinton and Congressional
Republicans forced a government shutdown for the second year in a
row. We were about midway between Newt Gingrich's "Contract for
America" and the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The Cold War had been
over for years. And only people in the intelligence community were
aware of a militant Middle Eastern group called Al-Qaeda. And 17
years from now, what will we make of the state of the union in 2013?
Will we have forgotten the NSA spy programs, the Republican
obstructionism, the do nothing Congress, the Tea Party, the
Recession, the Supreme-Court-mandated corporate personhood?
I've no scientific basis at all for
this speculation on the length of long-time memory. Some long-term
memories last decades, others are gone in a matter of days. Still
seventeen years seems to me like a good compromise for a breakpoint.
To what extent do we choose our
memories? To what extent do they choose us?
Memories seem to be part of us. They
allow us to re-experience our past, albeit in a less vivid and
physical way.
Loss of memory is the greatest loss
experienced by Alzheimer's patients. They are losing the awareness
of their past experiences and relationships. In a way they are
losing their selves.
Forgiving a past wrong often requires
forgetting the wrong.
Elizabeth Loftus, a memory researcher, has identified four major reasons why people forget: retrieval
failure, interference, failure to store and motivated forgetting.
“The advantage of a bad memory is
that one enjoys several times the same good things for the first
time.” - Friedrich Nietzsche
It is singular how soon we lose the
impression of what ceases to be constantly before us. A year
impairs, a luster obliterates. There is little distinct left without
an effort of memory, then indeed the lights are rekindled for a
moment - but who can be sure that the Imagination is not the
torch-bearer? - Lord Byron
Well, before I forget, I'm going out now and look around
and listen for some 17 year cicadas.
Hmmm...maybe long term memory disappears more quickly than I thought...An article in today's Huffington Post says that for the first time since 2005 GWB's favorable polling figures are higher than his unfavorable (49-46)- that's only eight years ago! Then again they may be comparing him to the Tea Partiers... (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/11/george-w-bush-rating_n_3423982.html)
ReplyDelete