Showing posts with label Bradley Manning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bradley Manning. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Military Injustice

____________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” ― Martin Luther King Jr.
____________________________________________________________________________
 
This morning a military judge sentenced Army Pfc. Bradley Manning to 35 years in prison for leaking classified documents to Wikileaks. This is a travesty that should be condemned by all right-thinking people on this planet. Evidently it's less offensive to commit war crimes than to release documents of the crimes without the government's permission.
 
During the Iraq War, more than 4000 Iraqi civilians were killed at the hands of US-led coalition forces and there have been little to no repercussions. Certainly not to the leaders who brought us into this totally illegal invasion on totally erroneoous information. Bush, Cheney and the neocons who planned this war will live out the rest of their lives in freedom and wealth. Likewise, "all upper-level US government officials who presided over the bloodbath that was the US occupation of Iraq, including the years of 2004-2009 covered in the documents exposed by Manning, will face no punishment of any kind." [Josh Dougherty, Iraq BodyCount website post Aug 2, 2013]
 
In his post, Josh Dougherty notes that some lower-level US troops have faced punishment for specific actions but this has been "quite rare and the punishments have typically been relatively light even where they were sought."
  • The US marines involved in the killing of 24 civilians in Haditha in November 2005 "faced virtually no legal consequences. One Marine was convicted of a minor offense for which he served no jail time, and the rest have all been acquitted or had all charges dropped."
  • "[H]elicopter pilots who gunned down at least ten civilians, including two Reuters journalists and a father of two children who stopped to try to help the wounded, as documented in the "Collateral Murder" video exposed by Bradley Manning, face no punishment of any kind."
  • The systematic torture of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison resulted in punishement of just eleven soldiers. "The heaviest sentence handed down to one soldier was 10 years in prison, for which he received parole after serving 6.5 years and is now free. Other sentences included reprimands, rank reductions, small fines or short prison terms."
 
So contrast that with the vindictive prosecution and sentencing of Bradley Manning for releasing documents the government chose to classify. 35 years for a victim-less crime. No one was killed. No one was tortured. This is so Kafka-esque that it defies belief.
 
Maybe the sentence will be reduced on appeal. After all, Lt. William Calley served just 3-1/2 years under house arrest at Fort Benning for his role in the 1968 My Lai massacre.   Lt. Calley, the only one of the 30 officers and enlisted men convicted, gave the order to the First Battalion to kill 70-80 My Lai villagers that had been rounded up.   The total massacred by various battalions of Charlie Company was at least 347.  These Vietnamese civilians included women, children and the elderly. 
 
But maybe not. Maybe Bradley Manning will spend the major portion of his remaining life in a military prison.  For Bradley Manning's crime has no victims.
 
Second Quote of the Day
“Some things you must always be unable to bear. Some things you must never stop refusing to bear. Injustice and outrage and dishonor and shame. No matter how young you are or how old you have got. Not for kudos and not for cash: your picture in the paper nor money in the back either. Just refuse to bear them.” ― William Faulkner, Intruder in the Dust
 
 

Saturday, August 10, 2013

Sunday Round-Up - August 11, 2013

This is the weekly selection of news and opinion from sources outside the US mainstream media.  Today we look at post-Constitutional America, the recently eviscerated Voting Rights Act, the "liberal media" and the surprising allies in the unfolding drama in Egypt.  Sources include TomDispatch.com, The Daily Kos, Mother Jones, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

__________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day
Judging from the main portions of the history of the world, so far,
justice is always in jeopardy. 
- Walt Whitman
__________________________________________________________________
 
Post-Constitutional America
In a TomDispatch post on August 4, former State Department whistle blower Peter van Buren paints a chilling picture of the America that we are now living in. Two hundred thirty five years to the day after the Continental Congress established the first whistle blower protection law (see below), Wiki-leaker Bradley Manning was convicted on 20 of 22 counts and now faces up to 136 years in prison. The government's actions have "ushered us, almost unnoticed, into post-Constitutional America." Van Buren notes that in recent years, "weapons, tactics, and techniques developed in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as in the war on terror have begun arriving in the homeland." His examples include up-armored police departments, drones, and "above all, suveillance technolgy." Also present in our post-Constitutional nation is a "new Guantanamo-ized definition of justice." And so to the arrest and detainment of Bradley Manning.   After his arrest, Manning was subjected to "three years of cruel detainment, where, as might well have happened at Gitmo, Manning, kept in isolation, was deprived of clothing, communications, legal advice, and sleep. The sleep deprivation regime imposed on him certainly met any standard, other than Washington’s and possibly Pyongyang’s, for torture." As for the trial itself, "rules of evidence reaching back to early English common law were turned upside down." So what are some aspects of post-Constitutional America as it is beginning to take shape? Just a few examples from Van Buren's post:
  • "Post-9/11, torture famously stopped being torture if an American did it, and its users were not prosecutable by the Justice Department."
  • "Full-spectrum spying is not considered to violate the Fourth Amendment and does not even require probable cause."
  • "Government whistleblowers are commanded to return to face justice, while law-breakers in the service of the government are allowed to flee justice."
  • "Secret laws and secret courts can create secret law you can’t know about for “crimes” you don’t even know exist. You can nonetheless be arrested for committing them."
 
The "Liberal Media"
The Daily Kos had a great post on August 7: "15 Things Everyone Would Know If There Were a Liberal Media".  From the impact of outsourcing on the US job market to the outrageous Republican gerrymandering of Congressional districts to US market-driven health care costs (highest per capita in the world) to the number of prisoners in US jails (we have 25% of the world's prisoners and rank #1 in this department), the post is well worth a read. Here's one of the neat graphics from the post.
 
1965 Voting Rights Act
On the 48th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act being signed into law by LBJ, Mother Jones had a post reminding us of how much the law has meant.   MJ presented "five recent and egregious examples of minority discrimination that were blocked by Section 5, the part of the law the Supreme Court eviscerated in June." Here are two of them:
  • The all-white board of aldermen in the town of Kilmichael, Mississippi (pop. 830), canceled town elections after an unprecedented number of black candidates made it onto the ballot. The DOJ forced an election and the town elected its first black mayor and three black aldermen.
  • After the 2010 census showed that blacks had become a majority in Georgia's Augusta-Richmond, the state Legislature passed a bill that "rescheduled voting from November, which had a traditionally high black voter turnout, to July, which had a low turnout overall, but especially for blacks. The change only affected Augusta-Richmond, and, not surprisingly, was rejected under Section 5."
 
The Egyptian Restoration
Sarah Chayes, in an August 1 article for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, "The Egyptian Restoration", tries to address recent developments in Egypt. "Much of the Egyptian population now embraces the very military it seemed bent on ejecting from power during the 2011 revolution. What's the reason for the about-face?", she asks. Chayes offers a reappraisal of the Egyptian Arab Spring based on interviews she conducted in 2011 and in July 2013:
1. The 2011 protesters were not revolting against the military. "The protests were enraged not at Mubarak’s army but at a tight network of high-rolling capitalists who were seen to have hijacked the Egyptian government (military included), rewriting the laws, awarding themselves privileged access to land and other public resources, and employing police repression, all for personal gain."
2. Democracy, per se, was not the aim of the 2011 revolution. "Protesters...were not demanding the vote for the sake of the vote. They were demanding the deliverables that are supposed to result from democracy...[They were demanding] that the perpetrators of the heist of public resources be subject to repercussions...the return of stolen or squandered public assets; an end to the pervasive corruption, which cascaded down from the top of the system to include daily shakedowns by auxiliary police, institutionalized graft in public tenders at all levels of government, and ad hoc fees demanded even by teachers and doctors."
3. The Morsi government was seen to be merely substituting Muslim Brotherhood networks for those of Mubarak. Many Egyptians became convinced "that the Muslim Brotherhood had no intention of enacting the type of systemic corrections the revolutionaries had demanded."
4. The Egyptian military is neither as powerful nor as competent as it is cracked up to be.
5. Some in both the Brotherhood and the military have an interest in continuing the violence. "The goal (achieved masterfully by the Algerian government in the 1990s) would be to present the people—and the international community—with a stark choice between authoritarianism and terrorism."
6. "Egyptians, for now, seem to have convinced themselves that this is indeed the choice they are facing. And they have chosen the former. They have opted for Restoration."
Other Stuff
Comics
Continental Congress' "Whistle Blower" Protection Law (July 30, 1778)
"...it is the duty of all persons in the service of the United States to give the earliest information to Congress or other proper authority of any misconduct, frauds, or misdemeanors committed by any officers or persons in the service of these states.”
Who Is "Mother Jones"?
Mother Jones is a courageous source of investigative journalism. But who, if anyone, is the publication's namesake? Well, according to Wikipedia: "Mary Harris "Mother" Jones (July 1837– 30 November 1930) was an Irish-American schoolteacher and dressmaker who became a prominent labor and community organizer. She then helped coordinate major strikes and cofounded the Industrial Workers of the World."


Sunday, June 16, 2013

Sunday Round-Up - June 16, 2013

This is the weekly selection of news and opinion from sources outside the US mainstream media.  Today we look at the government's prosecution of Bradley Manning, Obama's meeting with Chinese President Xi, and the progress towards reaching the UN's Millennium Development Goals.  Sources are TomDispatch (recent winner of Utne Reader's 2013 media award for best political coverage), Xinhuanet, and Le Monde Diplomatique.

The Prosecution of Bradley Manning

In a June 11 post on TomDispatch , human-rights lawyer Chase Madar takes on the "dystopian secrecy" of the post 9/11 era in the government's prosecution of Bradley Manning.  Manning, the Wikileaks source within the US Army, potentially faces decades of jail time if convicted. Speaking of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, Madar writes: "Both wars of occupation were ghastly strategic choices that have killed hundreds of thousands, wounded many more, sent millions into exile, and destabilized what Washington, in good times, used to call 'the arc of instability.' Why have our strategic choices been so disastrous? In large part because they have been militantly clueless. Starved of important information, both the media and public opinion were putty in the hands [of] the Bush administration and its neocon followers as they dreamt up and then put into action their geopolitical fantasies." Transparency in foreign relations is a good thing, argues Madar, and "what gets people killed, no matter how much our pols and pundits strain to deny it, aren’t InfoSec breaches or media leaks, but foolish and clueless strategic choices."  Madar contrasts the military's flexibility on rape and sexual assault and on the killing of foreign civilians with the strictness that they use in dealing with declassifying so-called classified information. He concludes that "the young private’s act of civil defiance was in fact a first step in reversing the pathologies that have made our foreign policy a string of self-inflicted homicidal disasters."

US - China Cooperation

On June 13, Xinhuanet reported on comments from a senior Chinese lawmaker on the recently concluded meeting between President Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping.   Referring to the historic summit as an important moment for China and the United States, Fu Ying, chairperson of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the 12th National People's Congress, spoke to the Washington-based think tank Brookings Institute. "One of the most important messages coming out of this summit is their commitment to working together to build a new model of relationship for the two countries to head for partnership, not for conflict as some had feared," she said. "We hope it will lead to many years of working together with excellent results coming on the way." The Xinhuanet article concludes: "During the summit at Annenberg estate, both Xi and Obama reaffirmed their commitment to seeking to build a new type of great-power relationship that features win-win cooperation based on mutual respect and benefit, so as to avoid the repetition of the zero-sum game usually seen in history between a resident power and an emerging one."
 
Millennium Development Goals

In a supplement to its June issue, Le Monde Diplomatique reported on the mixed results towards reaching the Millennium Development Goals adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2000. The eight goals to be achieved by 2015 are "to (i) eradicate extreme poverty and hunger, (ii) achieve universal primary education, (iii) promote gender equality and empower women, (iv) reduce child mortality, (v) improve maternal health, (vi) combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases, (vii) ensure environmental sustainability and (viii) develop a global partnership for development." The intent is to reach specific targets by following an action plan and measuring progress. Progress towards the goals is measured relative to 1990. The article by Philippe Rekacewicz notes that "India and China have made considerable headway [towards reaching the goals], while sub-Saharan Africa has stagnated or regressed."

Rekacewicz then reviews the three health goals in some detail. Goal 4 is "to reduce child mortality by two thirds. According to figures published by the UN Development Programme (UNDP), it fell by a third between 1990 and 2010, which is not fast enough....Only around 10 out of the 70 countries concerned are likely to achieve the two-thirds reduction by 2015. " Goal 5 (maternal health - reducing maternal mortality by 75%) has shown very slow progress: "In 2010 some 287,000 women died in childbirth (85% of them in sub-Saharan Africa and southern Asia), compared with 550,000 in 1990." Goal 6 ("combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases") has three separate targets:

  • Check the spread of HIV/AIDS. The rate of increase has slowed but as of 2010 the number of people living with the virus was still rising.
  • Provide access to antiretroviral treatments to all who need them by 2010. In 2010 6.5 million people received treatment compared to a worldwide total of over 30 million. But, Rekacewicz notes, "On the positive side, since 2005 the wider availability of treatment has significantly reduced mortality."
  • Combat the great endemic diseases, such as malaria and tuberculosis. Progress is being made on malaria - "World Health Organisation (WHO) figures show that the number of declared cases of malaria fell by 50% between 2000 and 2010 in 40 of the 100 countries where the disease is found." But the long-range outlook for malaria is somewhat pessimistic due to a lack of sufficient funding and "the emergence of drug-resistant strains in a growing number of Southeast Asian and sub-Saharan African countries". On a more confident note, the spread of tuberculosis "could be halted by 2015, in line with the development goal."

With less than three years to go before the 2015 deadline, many of the targets will not be achieved. The UN is trying to launch "accelerated action programmes" but, the article concludes, "if the institutions and states which pledged special contributions do not keep their promises, these efforts will come to nothing."